| 
September 27th, 2008, 11:05 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Linear Transformation, Nullity and rank... Find bases for both N(T) & R(T). Then compute the nullity and rank of T, and verify the dimension theorem. Use the appropriate theorems to determine whether T is 1-1 or onto..
T: R2 -> R3 defined by T(a1, a2) = (a1+ a2, 0, 2a1 - a2)
I'm not too sure where to go from finding the N(T)...I think I have a clue about the R(T)...but not totally sure...
All I got so far is that N(T) : a1 + a2 = 0
2a1 - a2 = 0 which gives a matrix...
| 1 1 |
| 2 -1 | this matrix can be reduced to
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 | and we can see that a1 = 0 and a2 = 0? Which means that the Basis of N(T) is (0,0) meaning dim N(t) = 0, and thus nullity of T = 0....this is what I got so far | 
September 27th, 2008, 11:31 PM
|  | vs Jhevon | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country: Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by leungsta Find bases for both N(T) & R(T). Then compute the nullity and rank of T, and verify the dimension theorem. Use the appropriate theorems to determine whether T is 1-1 or onto..
T: R2 -> R3 defined by T(a1, a2) = (a1+ a2, 0, 2a1 - a2)
I'm not too sure where to go from finding the N(T)...I think I have a clue about the R(T)...but not totally sure...
All I got so far is that N(T) : a1 + a2 = 0
2a1 - a2 = 0 which gives a matrix...
| 1 1 |
| 2 -1 | this matrix can be reduced to
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 | and we can see that a1 = 0 and a2 = 0? Which means that the Basis of N(T) is (0,0) meaning dim N(t) = 0, and thus nullity of T = 0....this is what I got so far | note that this linear transformation is characterized by multiplication by
now can you find N(T) and R(T)?
note that T is one-to-one iff A is invertible
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts." border="0" />
Join the dark side. We have cookies. Threads I link people to too often to have to be looking them up every time: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
September 27th, 2008, 11:40 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhevon note that this linear transformation is characterized by multiplication by
now can you find N(T) and R(T)?
note that T is one-to-one iff A is invertible | If I solve the matrix....I'll get
| 1 0 | a1 = 0
| 0 1 | a2 = 0
| 0 0 |
Basis of N(T) is (0, 0)
dim N(T) = 0
Basis of R(T) = { (1,0,0) (0,1,0) }
dim R(T) = 2
T is 1-1 since N(T) = {0v} if and only if dim N(T) = 0
Am I correct? | 
September 28th, 2008, 11:24 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 28
Country: Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | bumppp...anyone? I jus wanna know if I got the answer or not
oh forgot to mention that T would not be onto since it cannot map all of R^3 | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 PM. | | |
 | |  |