Of course, my solution is not the most elegant, but I think it is quite reasonable.
We define the independence of the integral from , for which we use the fact that the function of the form up to constant is the Fourier transform of unit step height in the interval . Consider this integral as the value at inverse Fourier transform of the product of the functions , but the contraction of the first n steps will be of compact support on the interval . Therefore, if , when calculating the convolution of this function with the last step, the width of at point , we simply calculate the area under the graph of the convolution of the first steps, but this area does not depend on .
We divide this integral into two intervals . Parameter we will suggest later, based on the conditions: . Now perform the substitution and estimate this integral on the interval :
Now we impose a condition on the parameter: a.
Now we estimate the integral on the interval :
From this representation and given the inequality , we obtain an estimate . And now we impose the condition . Let . Then the condition that means , but the condition means . Thus, when , all conditions are met.
So, on the basis of , it follows that
__________________ If you can dream — and not make dreams your master. If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim. If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster and treat those two impostors just the same.
The following users thank DeMath for this useful post:
Of course, my solution is not the most elegant, but I think it is quite reasonable.
We define the independence of the integral from , for which we use the fact that the function of the form up to constant is the Fourier transform of unit step height in the interval . Consider this integral as the value at inverse Fourier transform of the product of the functions , but the contraction of the first n steps will be of compact support on the interval . Therefore, if , when calculating the convolution of this function with the last step, the width of at point , we simply calculate the area under the graph of the convolution of the first steps, but this area does not depend on .
We divide this integral into two intervals . Parameter we will suggest later, based on the conditions: . Now perform the substitution and estimate this integral on the interval :
Now we impose a condition on the parameter: a.
Now we estimate the integral on the interval :
From this representation and given the inequality , we obtain an estimate . And now we impose the condition . Let . Then the condition that means , but the condition means . Thus, when , all conditions are met.
So, on the basis of , it follows that
well, it's easier than that! we first show, by induction over that the value of the integral, does not depend on for n = 1, we have t > 1. then:
now let and suppose that the claim is true for then, exactly the same as above, we'll have:
*
so we also proved that which, with gives us
* note that
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. " border="0" />
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NonCommAlg For This Useful Post:
Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics. Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.