| 
December 9th, 2006, 02:53 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 21
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | I think the way to treat 0/0 is to think about how you got to it in the first place.
For example, if you got a slop of 0/0 then x1-x2 must be 0 and y1 - y2 must be zero. The only way that could happen is if x1 = x2 and y1 = y2, so a slope of 0/0 means you used the same point to find slope twice.
__________________ "I am empowered to lie. But I have never lied to you." - The Giver | 
December 9th, 2006, 03:06 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: New England
Posts: 1,029
Country: Thanks: 32
Thanked 144 Times in 120 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pondermatic I think the way to treat 0/0 is to think about how you got to it in the first place.
For example, if you got a slop of 0/0 then x1-x2 must be 0 and y1 - y2 must be zero. The only way that could happen is if x1 = x2 and y1 = y2, so a slope of 0/0 means you used the same point to find slope twice. | Expanding on your thought.
1 point can be part of infinite amount of lines with different slopes, and thus 0/0 can equal anything.
And a line with the slope of 1/0 is straight up, and happens to be equal to a line with 2/0. Since all values of y come from the same coefficient, one could say that x/0 equals all numbers.
The problem is it doesn't
It doesn't equal any number. But I still like this way of looking at it. | 
December 9th, 2006, 03:07 PM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pondermatic intl. design is NOT:
3. unscientific. The theory has come up with a way of quantatively telling whether inteeligence made something or not and many proven scientific theories support, through that method, the idea of intl. design. | This is news to me. If you are willing, could you share with me what you are referring to? I'm curious.
-Dan
If you are willing to continue this (about intelligent design) perhaps we should open a new thread on it. I leave that to whomever wants to talk about it.
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
Last edited by topsquark; December 9th, 2006 at 03:19 PM.
Reason: Addendum
| 
December 9th, 2006, 03:44 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,379
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,619 Times in 2,916 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark This is news to me. If you are willing, could you share with me what you are referring to? I'm curious.
-Dan
If you are willing to continue this (about intelligent design) perhaps we should open a new thread on it. I leave that to whomever wants to talk about it. | Warning, I am very intolerant of religious threads and the over excitment
they are laible to produce.
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
December 9th, 2006, 04:25 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 278
Country: Thanks: 31
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick And a line with the slope of 1/0 is straight up, and happens to be equal to a line with 2/0. Since all values of y come from the same coefficient, one could say that x/0 equals all numbers. | I would rather say that x/0 can equal any arbitrary number times infinity, which happens to equal infinity. Infinity times zero is at least undefined, but any arbitrary number (as in all numbers) times zero is just zero and not x.
__________________ Don't worry, be happy <°)))>< | 
December 9th, 2006, 04:41 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,758 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TriKri I would rather say that x/0 can equal any arbitrary number times infinity, which happens to equal infinity. Infinity times zero is at least undefined, but any arbitrary number (as in all numbers) times zero is just zero and not x. | Please, stop, not here.
--------
I sent the "man" an e-mail. Asking him to explain it to me mathematically. Note, I am not saying he is wrong, but from what they show on the News he is. Also, I believe his work is not mathematically acceptable, however, it may be useful in computer science, which is his research field. | 
December 9th, 2006, 06:06 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 278
Country: Thanks: 31
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker Please, stop, not here. | Well, I don't say that it necessarily is that way, I still think that 1/0 should be undefined. But I prefer + infinity (excuse my last post in which I wrote + infinity) to Quick's suggestion that it could be any number, cause a line with "any slope" wouldn't pass through both (0, 0) and (0, 1).
__________________ Don't worry, be happy <°)))>< | 
December 9th, 2006, 06:59 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 21
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker however, it may be useful in computer science, which is his research field. | His so-called "nullity" already exists as, as several people have pointed out, NaN. The next time a Java program asks you to type in a number, type in NaN and see what happens.
__________________ "I am empowered to lie. But I have never lied to you." - The Giver | 
December 9th, 2006, 10:30 PM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: New England
Posts: 1,029
Country: Thanks: 32
Thanked 144 Times in 120 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TriKri Quick's suggestion that it could be any number, cause a line with "any slope" wouldn't pass through both (0, 0) and (0, 1). | Where did you get this?
I said an infinite amount of lines can pass through one point.
I also said that way was an incorrect way of looking at it, though I like how it's set up | 
December 10th, 2006, 01:13 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 278
Country: Thanks: 31
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick And a line with the slope of 1/0 is straight up, and happens to be equal to a line with 2/0. Since all values of y come from the same coefficient, one could say that x/0 equals all numbers. | Here's where i got it from, I interpreted what you wrote.
But I didn't mean to put it like you think it is that way even if it appeals to you, I'm sorry if I did.
__________________ Don't worry, be happy <°)))>< | 
December 10th, 2006, 01:29 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 21
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark This is news to me. If you are willing, could you share with me what you are referring to? I'm curious.
-Dan
If you are willing to continue this (about intelligent design) perhaps we should open a new thread on it. I leave that to whomever wants to talk about it. | Intelligent Design as a Theory of Information: Dembski, William A. A paper on "complex, sepcified information," which is used to test things to see whether or not they have been made by someone or something intelligent. Access Research Network The website the parper was on which supports intelligent design.
__________________ "I am empowered to lie. But I have never lied to you." - The Giver | 
December 10th, 2006, 01:58 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,379
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,619 Times in 2,916 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pondermatic | Long winded and as far as I can tell devoid of significant content.
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
December 10th, 2006, 07:35 PM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by The Pondermatic | I'm afraid I have to agree with CaptainBlack on this. However I will say that it is (for my part) a new approach to the problem. Unfortunatly I know enough about Chaos Theory to say that I don't think it will provide valid results. The problem is that nonlinear systems (as life very probably is) can contain rich and complicated structures that are based on very simple rules. So "information" that is considered complex enough to require a creator might still be viably produced by a simple nonlinear system. I don't see how the author would be able to tell the difference. (Of course, I don't know much about information theory, so what I just said could be a load of bull!  )
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
December 11th, 2006, 09:00 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,758 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | I am currently speaking with the person who created these numbers. This was not a new discovery, it was first made in 1997 by him. As you expected it was a generalization of the extended number line. But there is one important point, Quote: |
Originally Posted by Wikipedia ...but not recognized by the math community. | I believe the reason why (I have to wait for his official answer) is that he used a computer to prove consistency in logic. This is like the 4 colour theorem, rejected by math computer because it was solved via computers.
He mentioned to me a kind of algebra. As I was correct you cannot have a ring where "division by zero" is permitted (applause), however there is a specific kind of algebra structcure, called a "wheel". Given any commutative ring it can be extened to a wheel. That is essentially what he did, he transformed the reals (a commutative ring) into a wheel. | 
December 12th, 2006, 06:05 AM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| | Fascinating. However I have difficulty imagining the use of such a structure.
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | | The following users thank topsquark for this useful post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 PM. | | |