Not sure if this question is formulated correctly. I am reading:
For all
This would mean that for a even, any two elements in the sequence should be relatively prime without exception: . As you can see, the conjecture is simply wrong.
__________________ "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~Paul Erdős
Proof: Start by noticing -- see proof at Show that if m > n then ((a^2)^n) + 1 divides ((a^2)^n)− 1. So we can rewrite as , for and some x. It can be easily seen that k has the opposite parity of a. So if a is even, k is odd, and . If a is odd, k is even, and . QED
__________________ "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~Paul Erdős
Last edited by Media_Man; November 7th, 2009 at 06:00 AM.
Reason: inserted link
The following users thank Media_Man for this useful post:
Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics. Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.