| 
September 24th, 2009, 09:18 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Country: Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | What factors do 4,6,7 have in common Hey guys, not sure how to state this problem.
I am given the numbers 4,6, and 7. I am then told to find the common numbers of these 3 numbers from 1 to 400? How do I go about it besides listing all the multiples of 4, 6, and 7, and then finding the similar numbers? Thanks for any suggestions! | 
September 24th, 2009, 10:16 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Singapore
Posts: 118
Country: Thanks: 79
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
| | any common multiples of these three numbers would be a multiple of all three of the numbers. so multiply them | 
September 24th, 2009, 10:22 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Country: Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | ok, so if I multiply them the first multiple would be 4*6*7 = 168. However, 84 is a common multiple of 4,6, and 7, so it seems this doesn't do the trick. Or am I missing something? | 
September 25th, 2009, 12:25 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,757 Times in 4,190 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish ok, so if I multiply them the first multiple would be 4*6*7 = 168. However, 84 is a common multiple of 4,6, and 7, so it seems this doesn't do the trick. Or am I missing something? | Since  , any common multiples of  will be a multiple of 4, 6 and 7.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank mr fantastic for this useful post: | |  | 
September 25th, 2009, 02:05 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish ok, so if I multiply them the first multiple would be 4*6*7 = 168. However, 84 is a common multiple of 4,6, and 7, so it seems this doesn't do the trick. Or am I missing something? | 84 is the lowest common multiple of 4,6, & 7. Find all the mutliples of 84 between 84 and 400 = your answer. | 
September 25th, 2009, 10:51 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Country: Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Mr_fantastic,
Do you mind explaining why you chose 2^2 * 3 * 7 as the common factors? For example, why did you leave out the other 2? Or why not 2 * 3 * 7 instead of 2^2 * ... ?
I am just trying to figure out a methodical method to solve these types of problems and it seems your answer fits this, but just help me understand it.
Thanks! | 
September 25th, 2009, 05:05 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,757 Times in 4,190 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish Mr_fantastic,
Do you mind explaining why you chose 2^2 * 3 * 7 as the common factors? For example, why did you leave out the other 2? Or why not 2 * 3 * 7 instead of 2^2 * ... ?
I am just trying to figure out a methodical method to solve these types of problems and it seems your answer fits this, but just help me understand it.
Thanks! | OK, here's a better way:
7 is prime. So just get the lowest common multiple of 3 and 4 (which is 12) and then multiply by 7.
Alternatively, 3 is prime so just get the lowest common multiple of 4 and 7 (which is 28) and then multiply by 3.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
September 25th, 2009, 08:51 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Country: Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | thanks to all for your time and for your explanations mr_fantastic | 
September 25th, 2009, 11:44 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| | adding on to what mr. fantastic had said
when factorized 
he canceled off one of the 2's because in the factorized form u should be able to form each of the original numbers with the least amount of numbers used, in order to get your lowest common multiple
like for  you can form a 4 u can also form a 6 and also a 7 therefore this will give u, ur lowest common multiple which is 84 | 
September 25th, 2009, 11:50 PM
|  | Super Member | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 688
Country: Thanks: 21
Thanked 239 Times in 223 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish Mr_fantastic,
... why not 2 * 3 * 7 instead of 2^2 * ... ?
Thanks! | Because  and so therefore is not a factor of  .
This method is a methodical way to find the lcm of a set of numbers - break them down into their prime factors and form the number you get by taking the highest indices of those primes that you find in those numbers, and multiply it together.
This is the sort of thing you learn formally in an elementary number theory class at Uni level - it's straightforward to understand but rather trickier to prove.
__________________ "No matter how fast or how far you run, you're still in the space where you are." -- Russell | 
October 8th, 2009, 04:29 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 56
Country: Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| | Thanks again for the explanation guys! It makes perfect sense now | 
October 9th, 2009, 07:02 AM
| | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,487
Thanks: 324
Thanked 1,212 Times in 1,113 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by arze any common multiples of these three numbers would be a multiple of all three of the numbers. so multiply them | This is incorrect. 4 and 6 have a factor of 2 in common so the "least common multiple" of 4 and 6 is 2*2*3= 12. The "least common multiple" of 4, 6, and 7 is 12*7= 84. All common multiples of 4, 6, and 7 are multiples of 84. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 AM. | | |