| 
October 19th, 2008, 08:26 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | solve equation for x with lnx and x Hi, is it possible to solve the equation
y = alnx + bx + c?
I made it myself as it seems to best model something, and want a computer program i'm writing to be able to calculate x. Is this actually possible?
Thanks very much in advance for your help,
James | 
October 19th, 2008, 05:35 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,757 Times in 4,190 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jsab500 Hi, is it possible to solve the equation
y = alnx + bx + c?
I made it myself as it seems to best model something, and want a computer program i'm writing to be able to calculate x. Is this actually possible?
Thanks very much in advance for your help,
James | Do you want to solve for x in terms of y?
An exact solution will require using the Lambert W-function.
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
October 20th, 2008, 03:31 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Yes in terms of y.
How would i go about doing that?
Thanks | 
October 20th, 2008, 03:57 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 12,237
Country: Thanks: 2,574
Thanked 4,757 Times in 4,190 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jsab500 Yes in terms of y.
How would i go about doing that?
Thanks | Are you familiar with the Lambert W-function?
What's wrong with using a numerical procedure to get an approximate value of x for a given value of y .....?
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove: the impossible and the obvious. The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark. (Michelangelo Buonarroti) To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
October 20th, 2008, 07:14 AM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | nothing's wrong with it, but if there was a way to just get x = whatever, it would be significantly simpler. I'll have a look at that Lambert-W function.
Thanks a lot | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 AM. | | |
 | |  |