| 
July 4th, 2009, 09:44 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 123
Country: Thanks: 77
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | More efficient way to factor quadratic polynomials with a coefficient? I find it more so of a time sink than actually learning anything when factoring quadratic polynomials with a coefficient attached to
For instance, for any given expression  we must find the factors of both A and C. Such is the case in the following expression 
combinations to try
a.(4x+15)(x-1) b.(4x-15)(x+1)
c.(4x-1)(x+15) d.(4x+1)(x-15)
e.(4x+5)(x-3) f.(4x-5)(x+3)
g.(4x+3)(x-5) h.(4x-3)(x+5)
i.(2x+15)(2x-1) j.(2x-15)(2x+1)
k.(2x+5)(2x-3) l.(2x-5)(2x+3)
L. Is correct
This seems very long and extraneous, is there a more effective manner to factor such problems instead of having to produce a list of all possible combinations? I have a ti83 program that can do this for me, but I would rather not resort to it if it will hurt my math skills later down the road.
Many Thanks | 
July 4th, 2009, 09:51 AM
|  | A Cute Angle | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: P(I'm here)=1/3, P(I'm there)=t+1/3
Posts: 5,372
Country: Thanks: 524
Thanked 3,061 Times in 2,532 Posts
| | Hello,
Factor A :
Then apply methods you know (completing the square, ...)
__________________ Everything is possible. The impossible just takes longer. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
shinhidora production To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- I hate, I can't stand, I abhor, I dislike, I disdain, I detest, I loathe, I despise and I am repelled by tousled birds of pray. | 
July 4th, 2009, 10:18 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 123
Country: Thanks: 77
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Moo Hello,
Factor A :
Then apply methods you know (completing the square, ...) | Unfortunately Moo I am teaching myself, and not only do that I fail to see that method in the current chapter, but in future chapters as well. Therefore I am afraid I am at somewhat of a loss in understanding this method. | 
July 4th, 2009, 11:03 AM
|  | MHF Contributor | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: North Texas
Posts: 6,231
Country: Thanks: 52
Thanked 2,672 Times in 2,523 Posts
| | link to a video showing another factoring technique ... http://www.revver.com/video/644652/f...g-coefficient/ | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to skeeter For This Useful Post: | |  | 
July 4th, 2009, 11:19 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 296
Country: Thanks: 76
Thanked 95 Times in 84 Posts
| | You can use the crisscross type method. Putting factors of 4 in the first column and factors of -15 in the second, then multiplying the top left by the bottom right, and bottom left by the top right. Then if the sum of these results is the same as the coefficient of the x term then you have your factors.
e.g.
It's still trial and error, but you'll find that the more of these you do, the faster and easier they become | 
July 4th, 2009, 12:20 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 123
Country: Thanks: 77
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by skeeter | VERY helpful thank you so very much, and everyone else too! | 
July 4th, 2009, 01:15 PM
|  | He's dead, Jim | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Big Stone Gap, Virginia
Posts: 2,236
Country: Thanks: 522
Thanked 1,866 Times in 1,302 Posts
| | Hi Allyourbass2212, Let me offer this method. It works all the time and is easy to understand. I'll use your quadratic expression. Multiply the coefficient of the quadratic term by the constant. You need to find 2 factors whose product is -60 and whose sum is -4 (the coefficient of the linear term). It's not that hard. There is a small finite number of factors of -60. Sum is not -4 Sum is not -4 Sum is not -4 Sum is not -4 Sum is not -4, but it is +4. So Sum is -4. Now, it won't take you this many steps to come up with that combination. I just illustrated using the factors in sequential order. In reality, you should find them much quicker. Now, what to do with these two factors. We will replace the linear coefficiet (-4) with these two factors. Watch: Now use grouping to factor: It seems like a long way, but it is very efficient.
__________________ He who knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool, shun him. He who knows not and knows that he knows not is a child, teach him. He who knows and knows not that he knows is asleep, wake him. And he who knows and knows that he knows is wise, follow him. -- Persian Proverb To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | The following users thank masters for this useful post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29 AM. | | |