| 
09-04-2008, 10:24 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | help with normal distribution question hi, i'm having trouble understanding this normal distribution question. any help on how would you work this out.thanks The present air-traffic volume at the City airport (number of takeoffs and landings) during the peak period has a normal distribution with a mean, μ, of 100 planes and a standard deviation, σ, of 20 planes (a) If the present runway capacity (for takeoffs and landings) is 142 planes per hour, what is the current probability of air traffic congestion in the peak period? (that is, what is the probability that the volume exceeds capacity - assume just one peak period daily). (b) If the peak period volume increases by 70 % over the next 10 years (that is, the peak period volume still has a normal distribution but the mean and standard deviation are both 70 % higher), what is the probability of peak period congestion if the runway capacity is unchanged from the present? (c) If the projected growth is correct, what airport capacity is required 10 years from now if the current service level is to be maintained (that is the same probability of peak period congestion as at present. | 
09-05-2008, 07:17 AM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 6,062
Country: Thanks: 955
Thanked 2,342 Times in 2,116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony213 hi, i'm having trouble understanding this normal distribution question. any help on how would you work this out.thanks The present air-traffic volume at the City airport (number of takeoffs and landings) during the peak period has a normal distribution with a mean, μ, of 100 planes and a standard deviation, σ, of 20 planes (a) If the present runway capacity (for takeoffs and landings) is 142 planes per hour, what is the current probability of air traffic congestion in the peak period? (that is, what is the probability that the volume exceeds capacity - assume just one peak period daily). (b) If the peak period volume increases by 70 % over the next 10 years (that is, the peak period volume still has a normal distribution but the mean and standard deviation are both 70 % higher), what is the probability of peak period congestion if the runway capacity is unchanged from the present? (c) If the projected growth is correct, what airport capacity is required 10 years from now if the current service level is to be maintained (that is the same probability of peak period congestion as at present. | a) Let X be the random variable present air-traffic volume. I may be wrong but it looks to me like you should calculate Pr(X > 142).
Let Y be the random variable air-traffic volume in 10 years time. I may be wrong but it looks to me like you should:
b) calculate Pr(Y > 142).
c) find the value of a such that Pr(Y > a) = p, where p is the answer to a).
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove ...... the impossible and the obvious. Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part. Pressure makes diamonds. | 
09-06-2008, 10:44 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Country: Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mr fantastic a) Let X be the random variable present air-traffic volume. I may be wrong but it looks to me like you should calculate Pr(X > 142). for a what i did was 142-100/ 20 = 2.1 =.5-.4821 =0.0179
Let Y be the random variable air-traffic volume in 10 years time. I may be wrong but it looks to me like you should:
b) calculate Pr(Y > 142). for b 170 -142 / 34 =0.823 =.5-.2939 =0.2061
c) find the value of a such that Pr(Y > a) = p, where p is the answer to a). | do the first 2 parts look right. also how would i answer question c) im really stuck on that on
thanks | 
09-06-2008, 11:12 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 6,062
Country: Thanks: 955
Thanked 2,342 Times in 2,116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony213 do the first 2 parts look right. also how would i answer question c) im really stuck on that on
thanks | The answer to (a) is correct (within the accuracy of your tables) but (b) is not (you have made a very simple error which I leave for you to find). The setting out for both is diabolical.
I've shown how to do c): Find the value of a such that Pr(Y > a) = 0.0179.
To elaborate:
1. Find the value  such that  where Z is the standard normal variable (you must have been taught how to do this - use your tables in reverse ....).
2. Then
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove ...... the impossible and the obvious. Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part. Pressure makes diamonds. | 
09-06-2008, 11:19 PM
|  | Flow Master | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Zeitgeist
Posts: 6,062
Country: Thanks: 955
Thanked 2,342 Times in 2,116 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mr fantastic The answer to (a) is correct (within the accuracy of your tables) but (b) is not (you have made a very simple error which I leave for you to find). The setting out for both is diabolical.
I've shown how to do c): Find the value of a such that Pr(Y > a) = 0.0179.
To elaborate:
1. Find the value  of z such that  (you must have been taught how to do this - use your tables in reverse ....).
2. Then  | Regarding (b), do you honestly expect Pr(Z > 0.823) to be less than 0.5? Bearing in mind that 0.823 > 0 .....
__________________ There are two things you should never try to prove ...... the impossible and the obvious. Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part. Pressure makes diamonds. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 AM. | | |
 | |  |