| 
May 28th, 2007, 02:04 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Problem 24 Let  be continously differenciable on  . Solve the integral equation: | | The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post: | |  | 
May 28th, 2007, 03:22 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker Let  be continously differenciable on  . Solve the integral equation: ![[f(x)]^2 = \int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt [f(x)]^2 = \int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/0c50ccce995ceac784c469416148960b-1.gif) | Nice.
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
May 28th, 2007, 03:25 PM
|  | Bar0n | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: South African Republic
Posts: 1,959
Country: Thanks: 1,605
Thanked 1,421 Times in 869 Posts
| | So whats the answer CaptainBlack?
__________________ If you need more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix your program. - Linus Torvalds To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| 
May 28th, 2007, 03:37 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by janvdl So whats the answer CaptainBlack?  | Not telling; that would spoil the fun
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
May 28th, 2007, 03:40 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Country: Thanks: 29
Thanked 151 Times in 142 Posts
| | | 
May 28th, 2007, 05:41 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Country: Thanks: 29
Thanked 151 Times in 142 Posts
| | Is there a way to apply color and font to LaTeX? I want to try to white-out my solution, but as far as I can tell that's impossible. | 
May 30th, 2007, 08:58 AM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ecMathGeek | The LHS is
and the RHS is
so I would say "no."
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
May 30th, 2007, 01:49 PM
|  | vs Jhevon | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country: Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack No
The right hand side is not what you say!
RonL | it would be  ?
if so, it means there is something wrong with what ecMathGeek did, but i didn't really see anything wrong the first time i read it, i'll read it again | 
May 30th, 2007, 01:51 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhevon it would be  ?
if so, it means there is something wrong with what ecMathGeek did, but i didn't really see anything wrong the first time i read it, i'll read it again | ecMathGeeks proposed solution satisfies the integral equation (ish)
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno
Last edited by CaptainBlack; May 30th, 2007 at 10:57 PM.
| | The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post: | |  | 
May 30th, 2007, 08:29 PM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
| |
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
May 30th, 2007, 10:18 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark | So you have shown that if  , then: 
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
May 30th, 2007, 11:04 PM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark | If you don't like ecMathGeeks approach try a power series solution.
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | 
May 31st, 2007, 01:19 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 400
Thanks: 23
Thanked 70 Times in 68 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ecMathGeek | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack ecMathGeeks proposed solution satisfies the integral equation (ish) | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack So you have shown that if  , then:   | Then  So ecMathGeeks proposed solution does not satisfy the integral equation for any  , which the second post seems to imply, only when  Is that what is going on here?
Last edited by JakeD; May 31st, 2007 at 01:46 AM.
| 
May 31st, 2007, 02:38 AM
|  | Grand Panjandrum | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country: Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeD Then  So ecMathGeeks proposed solution does not satisfy the integral equation for any  , which the second post seems to imply, only when  Is that what is going on here? | The integral equation when converted to a diffrential equation is in fact
an initial value problem as of necessity
ecMathGeek gave a general solution to the DE that you get by differentiating
the integral equation but omitted the initial condition that forces  .
RonL
__________________ Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.
Giordano Bruno | | The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post: | |  | 
May 31st, 2007, 07:11 AM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlank If you don't like ecMathGeeks approach try a power series solution.
RonL | Not every continously differenciable function is analytic.*
*)By analytic I mean it has a power series expansion on  . | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 PM. | | |