Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > MHF Lounge > Problem of the Week
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 28th, 2007, 02:04 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default Problem 24

Let f be continously differenciable on \mathbb{R}. Solve the integral equation:

[f(x)]^2 = \int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The following users thank ThePerfectHacker for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old May 28th, 2007, 03:22 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
Let f be continously differenciable on \mathbb{R}. Solve the integral equation:

[f(x)]^2 = \int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt
Nice.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #3  
Old May 28th, 2007, 03:25 PM
janvdl's Avatar
Bar0n

 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South African Republic
Posts: 1,959
Country:
Thanks: 1,605
Thanked 1,421 Times in 869 Posts
janvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to janvdl
Default

So whats the answer CaptainBlack?
__________________
If you need more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix your program. - Linus Torvalds


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #4  
Old May 28th, 2007, 03:37 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by janvdl View Post
So whats the answer CaptainBlack?
Not telling; that would spoil the fun

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #5  
Old May 28th, 2007, 03:40 PM
ecMathGeek's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Country:
Thanks: 29
Thanked 151 Times in 142 Posts
ecMathGeek will become famous soon enoughecMathGeek will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
Let f be continously differenciable on \mathbb{R}. Solve the integral equation:

[f(x)]^2 = \int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt
I would much rather deal with a differential equation. Hopefully this works.

\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)]^2=\frac{d}{dx}\int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt

2[f(x)]f'(x) = [f(x)]^2+[f'(x)]^2

[f(x)]^2-2 [f(x) \cdot f'(x)] + [f'(x)]^2 = 0

[f(x) - f'(x)]^2=0

f(x)-f'(x)=0
f(x)=f'(x)
f(x) = Ae^x

Am I right?
  #6  
Old May 28th, 2007, 05:41 PM
ecMathGeek's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 436
Country:
Thanks: 29
Thanked 151 Times in 142 Posts
ecMathGeek will become famous soon enoughecMathGeek will become famous soon enough
Default

Is there a way to apply color and font to LaTeX? I want to try to white-out my solution, but as far as I can tell that's impossible.
  #7  
Old May 30th, 2007, 08:58 AM
topsquark's Avatar
Generous Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country:
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecMathGeek View Post
I would much rather deal with a differential equation. Hopefully this works.

\frac{d}{dx}[f(x)]^2=\frac{d}{dx}\int_0^x [f(t)]^2+[f'(t)]^2dt

2[f(x)]f'(x) = [f(x)]^2+[f'(x)]^2

[f(x)]^2-2 [f(x) \cdot f'(x)] + [f'(x)]^2 = 0

[f(x) - f'(x)]^2=0

f(x)-f'(x)=0
f(x)=f'(x)
f(x) = Ae^x

Am I right?
The LHS is
A^2e^{2x}

and the RHS is
(A^2 - 1)e^{2x}

so I would say "no."

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
  #8  
Old May 30th, 2007, 01:49 PM
Jhevon's Avatar
vs Jhevon
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 11,104
Country:
Thanks: 2,610
Thanked 4,271 Times in 3,970 Posts
Jhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond reputeJhevon has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack View Post
No

The right hand side is not what you say!

RonL
it would be \left( e^{2x} - 1\right)A^2 ?

if so, it means there is something wrong with what ecMathGeek did, but i didn't really see anything wrong the first time i read it, i'll read it again
  #9  
Old May 30th, 2007, 01:51 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhevon View Post
it would be \left( e^{2x} - 1\right)A^2 ?

if so, it means there is something wrong with what ecMathGeek did, but i didn't really see anything wrong the first time i read it, i'll read it again
ecMathGeeks proposed solution satisfies the integral equation (ish)

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno

Last edited by CaptainBlack; May 30th, 2007 at 10:57 PM.
The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #10  
Old May 30th, 2007, 08:29 PM
topsquark's Avatar
Generous Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,618
Country:
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,312 Times in 2,098 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Okay, I oopsied. But still:

f(x) = Ae^x

Thus
f(t) = Ae^t

\frac{df}{dt} = Ae^t

Thus
\int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

= \int_0^x dt \, (A^2e^{2t} + A^2e^{2t} )

= \int_0^x dt \, 2A^2e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \int_0^x dt \, e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \frac{1}{2}e^{2t}|_0^x

= A^2(e^{2x} - 1)

And
[ f(x) ] ^2 = A^2e^{2x}

So
[ f(x) ] ^2 \neq \int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

How can this then be the solution of the integral equation? I'm missing something here...

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
  #11  
Old May 30th, 2007, 10:18 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark View Post
Okay, I oopsied. But still:

f(x) = Ae^x

Thus
f(t) = Ae^t

\frac{df}{dt} = Ae^t

Thus
\int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

= \int_0^x dt \, (A^2e^{2t} + A^2e^{2t} )

= \int_0^x dt \, 2A^2e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \int_0^x dt \, e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \frac{1}{2}e^{2t}|_0^x

= A^2(e^{2x} - 1)

And
[ f(x) ] ^2 = A^2e^{2x}

So
[ f(x) ] ^2 \neq \int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

How can this then be the solution of the integral equation? I'm missing something here...

-Dan
So you have shown that if f(t) = Ae^t, then:

A^2e^{2x}= A^2(e^{2x} - 1)

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #12  
Old May 30th, 2007, 11:04 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topsquark View Post
Okay, I oopsied. But still:

f(x) = Ae^x

Thus
f(t) = Ae^t

\frac{df}{dt} = Ae^t

Thus
\int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

= \int_0^x dt \, (A^2e^{2t} + A^2e^{2t} )

= \int_0^x dt \, 2A^2e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \int_0^x dt \, e^{2t}

= 2A^2 \frac{1}{2}e^{2t}|_0^x

= A^2(e^{2x} - 1)

And
[ f(x) ] ^2 = A^2e^{2x}

So
[ f(x) ] ^2 \neq \int_0^x dt \, [ f(t) ]^2 + \left [ \frac{df}{dt} \right ] ^2

How can this then be the solution of the integral equation? I'm missing something here...

-Dan
If you don't like ecMathGeeks approach try a power series solution.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #13  
Old May 31st, 2007, 01:19 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 400
Thanks: 23
Thanked 70 Times in 68 Posts
JakeD will become famous soon enoughJakeD will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ecMathGeek View Post
f(x) = Ae^x
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack View Post
ecMathGeeks proposed solution satisfies the integral equation (ish)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlack View Post
So you have shown that if f(t) = Ae^t, then:

A^2e^{2x}= A^2(e^{2x} - 1)
Then A = 0. So ecMathGeeks proposed solution does not satisfy the integral equation for any A, which the second post seems to imply, only when f(x) = Ae^x = 0. Is that what is going on here?

Last edited by JakeD; May 31st, 2007 at 01:46 AM.
  #14  
Old May 31st, 2007, 02:38 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,373
Country:
Thanks: 667
Thanked 3,618 Times in 2,915 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeD View Post
Then A = 0. So ecMathGeeks proposed solution does not satisfy the integral equation for any A, which the second post seems to imply, only when f(x) = Ae^x = 0. Is that what is going on here?
The integral equation when converted to a diffrential equation is in fact
an initial value problem as of necessity f(0)=0

ecMathGeek gave a general solution to the DE that you get by differentiating
the integral equation but omitted the initial condition that forces A=0.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
The following users thank CaptainBlack for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #15  
Old May 31st, 2007, 07:11 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,754 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlank View Post
If you don't like ecMathGeeks approach try a power series solution.

RonL
Not every continously differenciable function is analytic.*


*)By analytic I mean it has a power series expansion on \mathbb{R}.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.