Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > MHF Lounge > Problem of the Week
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:02 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,265
Country:
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,580 Times in 2,885 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default Problem 28

Proposition 1: If x+y+z=1 then xy+yz+xz<1/2

Q1. Prove Proposition 1 is true

Q2. Prove Proposition 1 is false

There is a Q3 for when Q1 and Q2 have been settled.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old June 25th, 2007, 01:47 AM
red_dog's Avatar
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Medgidia, Romania
Posts: 1,158
Country:
Thanks: 22
Thanked 617 Times in 558 Posts
red_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to behold
Default

If x,y,z\in\mathbf{R} then
1=(x+y+z)^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+2(xy+xz+yz)\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow 2(xy+xz+yz)=1-(x^2+y^2+z^2)<1\Rightarrow
\displaystyle \Rightarrow xy+xz+yz<\frac{1}{2}. So the proposition is true.
If x,y,z\in\mathbf{C} then let x=i,y=-i,z=1.
Then \displaystyle xy+xz+yz=1>\frac{1}{2}. So the proposition is false.
  #3  
Old June 25th, 2007, 04:41 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,265
Country:
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,580 Times in 2,885 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red_dog View Post
If x,y,z\in\mathbf{R} then
1=(x+y+z)^2=x^2+y^2+z^2+2(xy+xz+yz)\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow 2(xy+xz+yz)=1-(x^2+y^2+z^2)<1\Rightarrow
\displaystyle \Rightarrow xy+xz+yz<\frac{1}{2}. So the proposition is true.
If x,y,z\in\mathbf{C} then let x=i,y=-i,z=1.
Then \displaystyle xy+xz+yz=1>\frac{1}{2}. So the proposition is false.

Q3. For x,y,z \in \mathbb{R} is the inequality tight, if not can you find a tight version.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #4  
Old June 25th, 2007, 07:06 AM
red_dog's Avatar
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Medgidia, Romania
Posts: 1,158
Country:
Thanks: 22
Thanked 617 Times in 558 Posts
red_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to behold
Default

For x,y,z\in\mathbf{R} the inequality is not tight.
We have x^2+y^2+z^2\geq xy+xz+yz\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow (x+y+z)^2-2(xy+xz+yz)\geq xy+xz+yz\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow xy+xz+yz\leq \frac{1}{3}<\frac{1}{2}.
The equality stands for x=y=z=\frac{1}{3}.
  #5  
Old June 25th, 2007, 07:22 AM
janvdl's Avatar
Bar0n

 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South African Republic
Posts: 1,947
Country:
Thanks: 1,603
Thanked 1,416 Times in 864 Posts
janvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant futurejanvdl has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to janvdl
Default

Hehehe, looks like this guy knows what he's doing, eh CaptainBlack?
__________________
If you need more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix your program. - Linus Torvalds
  #6  
Old June 25th, 2007, 07:40 AM
topsquark's Avatar
Generous Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,605
Country:
Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,305 Times in 2,093 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

"tight"?

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
  #7  
Old June 25th, 2007, 09:37 AM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,265
Country:
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,580 Times in 2,885 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red_dog View Post
For x,y,z\in\mathbf{R} the inequality is not tight.
We have x^2+y^2+z^2\geq xy+xz+yz\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow (x+y+z)^2-2(xy+xz+yz)\geq xy+xz+yz\Rightarrow
\Rightarrow xy+xz+yz\leq \frac{1}{3}<\frac{1}{2}.
The equality stands for x=y=z=\frac{1}{3}.
You need to fill in some of the detail so others can follow this more easily.

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #8  
Old June 25th, 2007, 08:34 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
mathisfun1 is on a distinguished road
Default

x^2+y^2+z^2 \ge xy + yz + zx results from AM-GM inequality.
Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  #9  
Old June 25th, 2007, 08:45 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathisfun1 View Post
Actually that is Cauchy-Swartz
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #10  
Old June 25th, 2007, 10:06 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,265
Country:
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,580 Times in 2,885 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathisfun1 View Post
Show us how.

I see how it follows from the Cauchy Scwartz inequality:

| \bold{x} \cdot \bold{y} |\le \| \bold{x} \|\ \| \bold{y} \|

Then putting \bold{x}=(a,b,c) and \bold{y}=(b,c,a), with a, b, c \in \mathbb{R}, we have:

ab + bc + ca \le |ab + bc + ca| \le \sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2}\ \sqrt{b^2+c^2+a^2} = a^2+b^2+c^2

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #11  
Old June 25th, 2007, 10:10 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBlank View Post
Show us how.
In the link I gave I use a complicated factorization and the AM-GM inequality to derive the special case of Cauchy-Swartz inequality. Perhaps, that is what the user means.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  #12  
Old June 25th, 2007, 10:48 PM
CaptainBlack's Avatar
Grand Panjandrum
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: South of England
Posts: 11,265
Country:
Thanks: 655
Thanked 3,580 Times in 2,885 Posts
CaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond reputeCaptainBlack has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
In the link I gave I use a complicated factorization and the AM-GM inequality to derive the special case of Cauchy-Swartz inequality. Perhaps, that is what the user means.
May be, but he should still make it explicit.

Perhaps we should have a Wiki page on inequalities and their derivation/proof?

RonL
__________________
Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.

Giordano Bruno
  #13  
Old June 25th, 2007, 11:36 PM
red_dog's Avatar
MHF Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Medgidia, Romania
Posts: 1,158
Country:
Thanks: 22
Thanked 617 Times in 558 Posts
red_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to beholdred_dog is a splendid one to behold
Default

The inequality x^2+y^2+z^2\geq xy+yz+zx can be proved like this:
Multiplying with 2, the inequality is equivalent to
2x^2+2y^2+2z^2\geq 2xy+2yz+2zx\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow (x^2-2xy+y^2)+(y^2-2yz+z^2)+(z^2-2zx+x^2)\geq 0\Leftrightarrow
\Leftrightarrow (x-y)^2+(y-z)^2+(z-x)^2\geq 0.
  #14  
Old June 26th, 2007, 05:53 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
mathisfun1 is on a distinguished road
Default

According to AM-GM, \frac{x^2+y^2}{2} \ge xy. Do the same for the other pairs of variables and add to get the desired inequality.


Credit must be given where credit is due -- I picked up this trick from the AoPS book Vol 2.
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.