| 
December 4th, 2007, 10:26 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Problem 43 1)Let  be real (or complex) distinct numbers where  . Define  . Can it be that  ?
(For example, let  then  ,  , and  but all three are not the same in this case).
The next problem is for the younger kids so please give them a chance.
2)Let  and  be functions which you can differenciate. Note that ![[f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x) [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/ea54776467b9e45791138a031d6d92f7-1.gif) . Can you find a formula for ![[f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e81fb9be7ed24bed346737eb78216192-1.gif) where by  means to preform differenciation  times repeatedly.
Last edited by ThePerfectHacker; December 6th, 2007 at 11:37 AM.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePerfectHacker For This Useful Post: | |  | 
December 4th, 2007, 11:28 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 426
Country: Thanks: 201
Thanked 96 Times in 90 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker 2)Let  and  be functions which you can differenciate. Note that ![[f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x) [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/ea54776467b9e45791138a031d6d92f7-1.gif) . Can you find a formula for ![[f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e81fb9be7ed24bed346737eb78216192-1.gif) where by  means to preform differenciation  times repeatedly. | After a little experimenting:
This reminds me of the binomial theorem:
So perhaps
Where  denotes the nth derivative of
Nice problem
P.S Is there any way to hide text? | | The following users thank DivideBy0 for this useful post: | |  | 
December 5th, 2007, 08:11 AM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,605
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,305 Times in 2,093 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 P.S Is there any way to hide text? | Color the text white.
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
December 5th, 2007, 10:51 AM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 Nice problem  | Good job. This result is called "Leibniz's Rule". | 
December 11th, 2007, 10:06 AM
|  | Generous Contributor | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 7,605
Country: Thanks: 643
Thanked 2,305 Times in 2,093 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker 1)Let  be real (or complex) distinct numbers where  . Define  . Can it be that  ?
(For example, let  then  ,  , and  but all three are not the same in this case). | Since I know the way your mind works, there is something wrong with what I am about to say...
Consider the case n = 3. Then the question is can 
where all three are distinct?
Obviously not since  .
Now, there's got to be something screwy here because I can generalize this argument to larger n and come up with similar results. But I can't believe it would be this easy...
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
December 11th, 2007, 10:37 AM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country: Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
| | I came up with problem #1 accidently when I playing around with polynomials. Here is my original solution, however it seems to me that this problem is easy even if approached directly. Proof:
Let  be real (or complex numbers) and define  . The key step is to note that  by using the general product rule for derivatives. Now,  thus,  , this means that  cannot attain the same values at  (meaning  ) because otherwise the situation is that a degree  polynomial attains the same value  times for  distinct numbers. Which is impossible. Thus,  cannot all be the same. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 PM. | | |