| 
12-04-2007, 10:26 PM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country: Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
| | Problem 43 1)Let  be real (or complex) distinct numbers where  . Define  . Can it be that  ?
(For example, let  then  ,  , and  but all three are not the same in this case).
The next problem is for the younger kids so please give them a chance.
2)Let  and  be functions which you can differenciate. Note that ![[f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x) [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/ea54776467b9e45791138a031d6d92f7-1.gif) . Can you find a formula for ![[f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e81fb9be7ed24bed346737eb78216192-1.gif) where by  means to preform differenciation  times repeatedly.
__________________ We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Last edited by ThePerfectHacker; 12-06-2007 at 11:37 AM.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePerfectHacker For This Useful Post: | |  | 
12-04-2007, 11:28 PM
|  | Super Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 499
Country: Thanks: 199
Thanked 98 Times in 92 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker 2)Let  and  be functions which you can differenciate. Note that ![[f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x) [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x)](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/ea54776467b9e45791138a031d6d92f7-1.gif) . Can you find a formula for ![[f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)}](http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/latex2/img/e81fb9be7ed24bed346737eb78216192-1.gif) where by  means to preform differenciation  times repeatedly. | After a little experimenting:
This reminds me of the binomial theorem:
So perhaps
Where  denotes the nth derivative of
Nice problem
P.S Is there any way to hide text? | | The following users thank DivideBy0 for this useful post: | |  | 
12-05-2007, 08:11 AM
|  | Physics Maestro | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 8,415
Country: Thanks: 642
Thanked 2,273 Times in 2,078 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 P.S Is there any way to hide text? | Color the text white.
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to Physics Help Forum!
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
12-05-2007, 10:51 AM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country: Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 Nice problem  | Good job. This result is called "Leibniz's Rule".
__________________ We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. | 
12-11-2007, 10:06 AM
|  | Physics Maestro | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 8,415
Country: Thanks: 642
Thanked 2,273 Times in 2,078 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker 1)Let  be real (or complex) distinct numbers where  . Define  . Can it be that  ?
(For example, let  then  ,  , and  but all three are not the same in this case). | Since I know the way your mind works, there is something wrong with what I am about to say...
Consider the case n = 3. Then the question is can 
where all three are distinct?
Obviously not since  .
Now, there's got to be something screwy here because I can generalize this argument to larger n and come up with similar results. But I can't believe it would be this easy...
-Dan
__________________ Got a Physics question? Come on over to Physics Help Forum!
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert | 
12-11-2007, 10:37 AM
|  | Global Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country: Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
| | I came up with problem #1 accidently when I playing around with polynomials. Here is my original solution, however it seems to me that this problem is easy even if approached directly. Proof:
Let  be real (or complex numbers) and define  . The key step is to note that  by using the general product rule for derivatives. Now,  thus,  , this means that  cannot attain the same values at  (meaning  ) because otherwise the situation is that a degree  polynomial attains the same value  times for  distinct numbers. Which is impossible. Thus,  cannot all be the same.
__________________ We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:21 AM. | | |