Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > Math Help Forum Lounge > Problem of the Week
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2007, 10:26 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country:
Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default Problem 43

1)Let a_1,a_2,...,a_n be real (or complex) distinct numbers where n\geq 2. Define P_k = \prod_{j\not = k} (a_k - a_j). Can it be that P_1=P_2=...=P_n?
(For example, let a_1=1,a_2=2,a_3=3 then P_1 = (1-2)(1-3)=2, P_2 = (2-1)(2-3)=-1, and P_3=(3-1)(3-2)=2 but all three are not the same in this case).

The next problem is for the younger kids so please give them a chance.

2)Let f(x) and g(x) be functions which you can differenciate. Note that [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x). Can you find a formula for [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} where by ^{(n)} means to preform differenciation n times repeatedly.
__________________
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Last edited by ThePerfectHacker; 12-06-2007 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ThePerfectHacker For This Useful Post:
Donate to MHF
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 12-04-2007, 11:28 PM
DivideBy0's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 499
Country:
Thanks: 199
Thanked 98 Times in 92 Posts
DivideBy0 has a spectacular aura aboutDivideBy0 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
2)Let f(x) and g(x) be functions which you can differenciate. Note that [f(x)g(x)]' = f'(x)g(x)+f(x)g'(x). Can you find a formula for [f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} where by ^{(n)} means to preform differenciation n times repeatedly.
After a little experimenting:

[f(x)g(x)]'=f'(x)g(x) + f(x)g'(x)

[f(x)g(x)]''=f''(x)g(x)+2f'(x)g'(x)+f(x)g''(x)

[f(x)g(x)]''' = f'''(x)g(x)+3f''(x)g'(x)+3f'(x)g''(x)+f(x)g'''(x)

This reminds me of the binomial theorem:

(x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n {n \choose k}x^{n-k} y^{k}

So perhaps

[f(x)g(x)]^{(n)} = \sum_{k=0}^n {n\choose k} f^{n-k}(x) g^{k}(x)

Where h^n(x) denotes the nth derivative of h(x)

Nice problem

P.S Is there any way to hide text?
Reply With Quote
The following users thank DivideBy0 for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #3  
Old 12-05-2007, 08:11 AM
topsquark's Avatar
Physics Maestro

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 8,415
Country:
Thanks: 642
Thanked 2,273 Times in 2,078 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 View Post
P.S Is there any way to hide text?
Color the text white.

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to Physics Help Forum!

"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2007, 10:51 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country:
Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DivideBy0 View Post
Nice problem
Good job. This result is called "Leibniz's Rule".
__________________
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2007, 10:06 AM
topsquark's Avatar
Physics Maestro

 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Angelica, NY
Posts: 8,415
Country:
Thanks: 642
Thanked 2,273 Times in 2,078 Posts
topsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond reputetopsquark has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
1)Let a_1,a_2,...,a_n be real (or complex) distinct numbers where n\geq 2. Define P_k = \prod_{j\not = k} (a_k - a_j). Can it be that P_1=P_2=...=P_n?
(For example, let a_1=1,a_2=2,a_3=3 then P_1 = (1-2)(1-3)=2, P_2 = (2-1)(2-3)=-1, and P_3=(3-1)(3-2)=2 but all three are not the same in this case).
Since I know the way your mind works, there is something wrong with what I am about to say...

Consider the case n = 3. Then the question is can
a_1a_2 = a_1a_3 = a_2a_3
where all three are distinct?

Obviously not since a_1a_2 = a_1a_3 \implies a_2 = a_3.

Now, there's got to be something screwy here because I can generalize this argument to larger n and come up with similar results. But I can't believe it would be this easy...

-Dan
__________________
Got a Physics question? Come on over to Physics Help Forum!

"I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain." - The Litany Against Fear, "Dune" by Frank Herbert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2007, 10:37 AM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,339
Country:
Thanks: 329
Thanked 2,943 Times in 2,472 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I came up with problem #1 accidently when I playing around with polynomials. Here is my original solution, however it seems to me that this problem is easy even if approached directly.

Proof:
Let a_1,...,a_n be real (or complex numbers) and define f(x) = (x-a_1)...(x-a_n). The key step is to note that f'(x_k) = P_k by using the general product rule for derivatives. Now, \deg f(x) = n\geq 2 thus, \deg f'(x) = n-1\geq 1, this means that f'(x) cannot attain the same values at a_1,a_2,...,a_n (meaning f(a_1)=f(a_2)=...=f(a_n)) because otherwise the situation is that a degree n-1 polynomial attains the same value n times for n distinct numbers. Which is impossible. Thus, P_1,P_2,...,P_n cannot all be the same.
__________________
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2008 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.