Math Help Forum

Math Help Forum Feed Site Feed

Go Back   Math Help Forum > MHF Lounge > Problem of the Week
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th, 2008, 11:20 PM
ThePerfectHacker's Avatar
Global Moderator

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,186
Country:
Thanks: 482
Thanked 3,751 Times in 3,070 Posts
ThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond reputeThePerfectHacker has a reputation beyond repute
Default Problem 48

1) Let n\geq 2 prove that 1 - \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n} is not an integer.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Democracy has proved only that the best way to gain power
over people is to assure the people that they are ruling
themselves. Once they believe that, they make wonderfully
submissive slaves." - Joseph Sobran


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old April 21st, 2008, 03:09 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
Country:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Math's-only-a-game is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
1) Let n\geq 2 prove that 1 - \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n} is not an integer.
Let k ΞZ such that 2^k £ n < 2^k+1

Let m be the least common multiple of 1,2,3,…,n except 2^k.

Then multiplying S = 1 – 1/2 + 1/3 -…..± 1/n by m we have:

mS = m – m/2 + m/3 -……± m/n

Each number on the right hand side is an integer except m/2^k and hence Sm is not an integer, which implies Sm is not an integer.
  #3  
Old April 23rd, 2008, 04:14 PM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 720
Country:
Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 307 Posts
icemanfan is a jewel in the roughicemanfan is a jewel in the roughicemanfan is a jewel in the roughicemanfan is a jewel in the rough
Default

By the alternating series theorem, the partial sum will always be less than one but greater than zero, and therefore not an integer.
  #4  
Old April 25th, 2008, 02:31 PM
Aryth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 459
Country:
Thanks: 106
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
Aryth has a spectacular aura aboutAryth has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
1) Let n\geq 2 prove that 1 - \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n} is not an integer.
The series you presented is the Alternating Harmonic Series, which is Conditionally Convergent, the series is represented by:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}\right)

The series' terms look like such:

1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n}

This series converges to \ln{2}

Since the series converges to \ln{2} and since:

|a_{n+1}| < |a_n|

Then for n \geq 2 the series can never reach one since it is incrementing up or down by smaller amounts. Since you subtract \frac{1}{2} from 1 for n=2, and since the terms are decreasing and alternating in sign, then the series will never reach one again, therefore, this can't be an integer for n \geq 2 because all terms are decreasing,therefore the partial sums remain between 1 and 0.
The following users thank Aryth for this useful post:
Donate to MHF
  #5  
Old April 25th, 2008, 02:36 PM
Danshader's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia now stop asking me where is malaysia...
Posts: 158
Country:
Thanks: 27
Thanked 58 Times in 57 Posts
Danshader will become famous soon enough
Default

how about considering:
1 +1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + .... ===>A
and
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/6 +.... =====>B

to get the required series:
A - 2B
__________________
Cookies
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
owns
Beware of the cookie mobster.
\(-_-; )/
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
o(o.O )
Stick them out!!Not your hands...
Gimmeh all your cookies!!
What goes up must come down but we ain't going down we will live it up to expectations.
  #6  
Old April 25th, 2008, 03:14 PM
Aryth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 459
Country:
Thanks: 106
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
Aryth has a spectacular aura aboutAryth has a spectacular aura about
Default

Yeah, that is a distinct possibility...

The Alternating Series does equal:

H(n) - H(2n)

Where H(n) is the n-th harmonic number
  #7  
Old May 14th, 2008, 08:11 AM
Henderson's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 112
Country:
Thanks: 5
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
Henderson will become famous soon enough
Default

Huh. I stayed away from this one because I didn't pick up on the series alternating- I read \pm \frac{1}{n} as saying each term could either be added or subtracted, without nessecarily alternating.

Is there a similar solution to this problem?
  #8  
Old June 4th, 2008, 12:01 PM
Aryth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 459
Country:
Thanks: 106
Thanked 157 Times in 147 Posts
Aryth has a spectacular aura aboutAryth has a spectacular aura about
Default

You can't know what sign the last number of the series is going to be, that all depends on n, so the \pm means that it can be positive or negative depending on n. The initial pattern reveals an alternating series.
  #9  
Old June 6th, 2008, 02:14 PM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12
Country:
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Jacobsen is on a distinguished road
Default

[FONT='Cambria Math','serif']My first thought was to try an inductive argument, but I had a lot of difficulty getting it going. I don’t think what I came up with is sound, but nevertheless I decided to post what I came up with.

Proof. It suffices to show that for all
n≥2; 1-1/2+1/3-…±1/n ∈ (0,1).
Let Pn denote the proposition that
1-1/2+1/3-…±1/(n-1) ∈ (0,1)
and
1-1/2+1/3-…±1/(n-1)±1/n∈ (0,1).
Then P3 is true since
1-1/2=1/2∈ (0,1)
and
1-1/2+1/3=5/6∈ (0,1)
Assume Pn is true and that n is even. Then
1-1/2+1/3-…+1/(n-1) ∈ (0,1)
and
1-1/2+1/3-…+1/(n-1)-1/n ∈ (0,1).
Because 1/(n+1) < 1/n, it follows from the inductive hypothesis that
1-1/2+1/3-…+1/(n-1)-1/n+1/(n+1) ∈ (0,1).
The case where n is odd is similar. So by the principle of mathematical induction, for all n ≥ 3, Pn is true and hence for all n ≥ 2, 1-1/2 +1/3 -…±1/n ∈ (0,1) and hence not an integer. //

[/font]
  #10  
Old July 7th, 2008, 05:14 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Country:
Thanks: 26
Thanked 59 Times in 49 Posts
meymathis will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danshader View Post
how about considering:
1 +1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + .... ===>A
and
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/6 +.... =====>B

to get the required series:
A - 2B
These two series do not converge.
  #11  
Old July 7th, 2008, 10:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Country:
Thanks: 26
Thanked 59 Times in 49 Posts
meymathis will become famous soon enough
Default

Ok, how about this. It is basically Aryth's post but a bit more explicit.

Let A_N = 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \ldots  \pm\frac{1}{N} which is just the partial sums.

Consider the (sub) sequence of partial sums:

O_N = 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \ldots + \frac{1}{2N+1} for N\geq1

O_N is a subsequence of A_N which as noted above converges to ln(2) (derive using MacLauren expansion of ln at x=1). Then O_N\rightarrow\ln(2).

O_N is monotonically decreasing:

O_{N+1}-O_N = - \frac{1}{2N+2} + \frac{1}{2N+3} < 0

Note that O_0=1 and so 1>O_N\geq\ln(2)\approx0.693 for N>0 and so cannot be an integer.

Likewise for the partial sums:

E_N = 1 + \ldots - \frac{1}{2N} for N\geq1

except that E_N monotonically increases from 1/2 to ln(2).

Put it together and we just showed the odd and even elements of the partial sums A_N are never integers after 1.
  #12  
Old July 30th, 2008, 07:58 AM
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lore is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danshader View Post
how about considering:
1 +1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + .... ===>A
and
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/6 +.... =====>B

to get the required series:
A - 2B
A - 2B = 0? Considering B = A/2...
  #13  
Old September 8th, 2008, 11:59 AM
bkarpuz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: R³
Posts: 320
Country:
Thanks: 80
Thanked 65 Times in 59 Posts
bkarpuz will become famous soon enoughbkarpuz will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to bkarpuz Send a message via AIM to bkarpuz Send a message via MSN to bkarpuz Send a message via Yahoo to bkarpuz Send a message via Skype™ to bkarpuz
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lore View Post
A - 2B = 0? Considering B = A/2...
As meymathis said, these two series do not converge, in other words, A=\infty and B=\infty.
So you do algebric operations on infinite numbers, which may confuse your mind.
  #14  
Old October 11th, 2008, 12:49 AM
Suzan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Turkey
Posts: 4
Country:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Suzan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
1) Let n\geq 2 prove that 1 - \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n} is not an integer.
Suppose that . Choose an integer such that .
Then
Consider the lowest common multiple of . This number will be of the form , where is an odd integer. Now multiply both sides of the equation by this number, to get

Now, when multiplied out, all the terms on the left will be integers, except one:

is not an integer, since is odd. So the left hand side is not an integer, and hence neither is the right hand side. That means that is not an integer.





Not:
http://plus.maths.org/issue12/features/harmonic/index.html

Last edited by Suzan; October 12th, 2008 at 01:11 PM.
  #15  
Old October 12th, 2008, 09:48 AM
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 566
Country:
Thanks: 44
Thanked 246 Times in 213 Posts
shawsend is a jewel in the roughshawsend is a jewel in the roughshawsend is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post
1) Let n\geq 2 prove that 1 - \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} - ... \pm \frac{1}{n} is not an integer.
I'm confussed since \sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{k}<1

However H_n=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}\to\infty and my understanding is that H_n is never an integer for n>1. This one would seem to be more interesting to prove.

[edit] I think that's what Susan did. Never mind but perhaps we should make it explicit that's what's going on.
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
©2005 - 2009 Math Help Forum


Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.