For how many real numbers x does e^x=ln|x|? - Math Help Forum

$Math Help Forum$

$Go Back$		Math Help Forum > College/University Maths Help > Calculus
$Reload this Page$ For how many real numbers x does e^x=ln\|x\|?

Mark Forums Read

$Reply$

Page 1 of 2

1

#1

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 08:14 PM

JOhkonut $JOhkonut is offline$

Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 45

Country:

United States

Thanks: 21

Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

$JOhkonut is on a distinguished road$

$Default$ For how many real numbers x does e^x=ln|x|?

For how many real numbers $x$ does $e^x=\ln|x|$ ?

0,1,2,3 or infinitely many?

Hmmm....

Oh yea, no graphing calculator for this question.

$Reply With Quote$

Advertisement

#2

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 08:27 PM

$Jhevon's Avatar$

Jhevon $Jhevon is offline$

Bent on World Domination!

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: New York, USA

Posts: 10,220

Country:

Jamaica

Thanks: 1,838

Thanked 3,611 Times in 3,396 Posts

$Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOhkonut $View Post$

For how many real numbers $x$ does $e^x=\ln|x|$ ?

0,1,2,3 or infinitely many?

Hmmm....

Oh yea, no graphing calculator for this question.

hmmm, the easiest way to see the answer is through graphs. of course, i didn't use a graphing calculator either

knowing what these graphs look like in your head makes the answer obvious. the other alternative i can think of is too complicated (using Newton's method and a whole lot of speculation)

the answer is 1 by the way ....note that $\ln |x| = \left \{ \begin{array}{lr} \ln x & \mbox{ if } x > 0 \\ & \\ \ln (-x) & \mbox{ if } x < 0 \\ & \\ \text{Does not exist} & \mbox{ if } x = 0 \end{array} \right.$

__________________

$<img src=http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=3918&dateline=1208895702 border=0 alt= />$

Join the dark side. We have cookies.

$Reply With Quote$

The following users thank Jhevon for this useful post:
JOhkonut
$Donate to MHF$

#3

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 08:38 PM

JOhkonut $JOhkonut is offline$

Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 45

Country:

United States

Thanks: 21

Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

$JOhkonut is on a distinguished road$

$Default$

Well, I am supposed to know what the \ln x and e^x graphs look like, and I get how they intersect once, but I have no clue how to show that...

$Reply With Quote$

#4

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 09:14 PM

$Jhevon's Avatar$

Jhevon $Jhevon is offline$

Bent on World Domination!

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: New York, USA

Posts: 10,220

Country:

Jamaica

Thanks: 1,838

Thanked 3,611 Times in 3,396 Posts

$Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOhkonut $View Post$

Well, I am supposed to know what the \ln x and e^x graphs look like, and I get how they intersect once, but I have no clue how to show that...

well, for positive x-values, e^x is always bigger than ln(x), so there is no intersection there. but for negative x values, e^x keeps decreasing tending to zero, while ln(-x) keeps increasing, tending to infinity. the shapes of the graphs make it obvious they will cross each other only once, as one is strictly increasing and the other is strictly decreasing

see below. of course, you should know how this looks in your head, no graphing tool necessary

Attached Thumbnails

$how-many-real-numbers-x-does-e-x-ln-x-graph.jpg$

__________________

$<img src=http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=3918&dateline=1208895702 border=0 alt= />$

Join the dark side. We have cookies.

$Reply With Quote$

The following users thank Jhevon for this useful post:
JOhkonut
$Donate to MHF$

#5

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 09:19 PM

JOhkonut $JOhkonut is offline$

Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 45

Country:

United States

Thanks: 21

Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

$JOhkonut is on a distinguished road$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhevon $View Post$

well, for positive x-values, e^x is always bigger than ln(x), so there is no intersection there. but for negative x values, e^x keeps decreasing tending to zero, while ln(-x) keeps increasing, tending to infinity. the shapes of the graphs make it obvious they will cross each other only once, as one is strictly increasing and the other is strictly decreasing

see below. of course, you should know how this looks in your head, no graphing tool necessary

Thanks a bunch, I saw that when I used my graphing calculator, and just included a sketch of it.

$Reply With Quote$

#6

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 09:28 PM

Soroban $Soroban is online now$

Super Member

Join Date: May 2006

Location: Lexington, MA (USA)

Posts: 5,635

Thanks: 274

Thanked 2,902 Times in 2,340 Posts

$Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$ $Soroban has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Hello, JOhkonut!

Quote:

For how many real numbers $x$ does $e^x\:=\:\ln|x|$ ?

You know that $y \:=\:e^x$ looks like, right?

Code:

                |      *
                |
                |     *
                |    *
                |  *
                *
            *   |
      *         |
  - - - - - - - + - - - - - - -
                |

And you know what $y \:=\:\ln x$ looks like.
. . (It's the inverse of the exponential function.)

Then $y \:=\:\ln|x|$ is the same graph
. . but with a reflection over the y-axis.

Code:

                |
    *           |           *
        *       |       *
  - - - - -*- - + - -*- - - - -
             *  |  *
              * | *
                |
               *|*
                |

Now place them on the same graph and count the intersections.

Darn . . . too slow again!
.

$Reply With Quote$

The following users thank Soroban for this useful post:
JOhkonut
$Donate to MHF$

#7

$Old$ 08-28-2008, 10:16 PM

$Jhevon's Avatar$

Jhevon $Jhevon is offline$

Bent on World Domination!

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: New York, USA

Posts: 10,220

Country:

Jamaica

Thanks: 1,838

Thanked 3,611 Times in 3,396 Posts

$Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soroban $View Post$

Darn . . . too slow again!

That's because you take the time to do those amazing graphs. i don't know how you do it, it seems really hard to me, i'd get too frustrated trying to line everything up

__________________

$<img src=http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=3918&dateline=1208895702 border=0 alt= />$

Join the dark side. We have cookies.

$Reply With Quote$

#8

$Old$ 08-29-2008, 12:11 AM

$Chris L T521's Avatar$

Chris L T521 $Chris L T521 is offline$

Carrier of the DEasease

Join Date: May 2008

Location: Arlington Heights, Illinois

Posts: 1,394

Country:

United States

Thanks: 969

Thanked 818 Times in 614 Posts

$Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$ $Chris L T521 is a splendid one to behold$

$Send a message via AIM to Chris L T521$

Send a message via Skype™ to Chris L T521

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jhevon $View Post$

That's because you take the time to do those amazing graphs. i don't know how you do it, it seems really hard to me, i'd get too frustrated trying to line everything up

Ditto

--Chris

__________________
$\color{blue}\text{ if }\Re[z]<0\text{ and }0<a\leq 1,$

$\color{blue}\zeta(z,a)=\frac{2\Gamma(1-z)}{(2\pi)^{1-z}}\left[\sin\left(\frac{\pi z}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\cos(2\pi a n)}{n^{1-z}}+\cos\left(\frac{\pi z}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin(2\pi a n)}{n^{1-z}}\right]$

$Reply With Quote$

#9

$Old$ 08-29-2008, 04:33 AM

$mr fantastic's Avatar$

mr fantastic $mr fantastic is offline$

Flow Master

Join Date: Dec 2007

Location: Zeitgeist

Posts: 6,069

Country:

Australia

Thanks: 957

Thanked 2,346 Times in 2,120 Posts

$mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$ $mr fantastic has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moo $View Post$

Hello !

One way to do it, without graph, is to study the function $f(x)=e^x-\ln|x|$ . Now, be patient and read carefully

IF X<0

$f~'(x)=e^x-\frac 1x$

$f~'(x)<0 \Leftrightarrow e^x<\frac 1x \implies xe^x>1$

Which is not possible, because $e^x>0$ and $x<0$

Therefore, $f~'(x)>0$ and f is strictly increasing when x<0.

$\lim_{x \to -\infty} f(x)=- \infty$

$\lim_{x \to 0^-} f(x)=+ \infty$ (x=0 is a vertical asymptote)

$\boxed{\text{There is one and only one value of x}<\text{0 such that f(x)=0}}$

-----------------------------------------------

IF X>0

$f~'(x)=e^x-\frac 1x$

$f~'(x)<0 \Leftrightarrow e^x<\frac 1x \Leftrightarrow xe^x<1$

Let $g(x)=xe^x$

$g'(x)=e^x+xe^x > 0 \quad \forall x$

Therefore, g is strictly increasing.

$\lim_{x \to 0^+} g(x)=0$

$\lim_{x \to + \infty} g(x)=+\infty$

We can conclude that there exists a>0 such that $g(x)<1 \Leftrightarrow x<a \text{ where } g(a)=1$

So $f~'(x)<0 \Leftrightarrow g(x)<1 \Leftrightarrow x<a$

The function f is decreasing if x<a and then increasing if x>a. Thus f(a) is a minimum of f(x), for x>0.

Since $g(a)=1$ , we have $ae^a=1 \implies \frac 1a=e^a$

$f(a)=e^a-\ln(a)=\frac 1a-\ln(e^{-a})=\frac 1a+a$ , which is $>0$ since $a>0$

$\boxed{\implies \forall x>0 ~,~ f(x)\ge f(a)>0 \implies f(x) \neq 0 \quad \forall x>0}$

Sorry for the confusion For some reason, I took at least twice the wrong function, and hence the *woops* mistakes

Life's too short. I think I'll wait for it to come out on DVD ......

__________________
There are two things you should never try to prove ...... the impossible and the obvious.

Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.

Pressure makes diamonds.

Last edited by mr fantastic; 08-29-2008 at 04:25 PM. Reason: I never refuse a request from a cow lol!!

$Reply With Quote$

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mr fantastic For This Useful Post:
Chris L T521, Jhevon, Moo
$Donate to MHF$

#10

$Old$ 08-29-2008, 08:21 AM

$Jhevon's Avatar$

Jhevon $Jhevon is offline$

Bent on World Domination!

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: New York, USA

Posts: 10,220

Country:

Jamaica

Thanks: 1,838

Thanked 3,611 Times in 3,396 Posts

$Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$ $Jhevon has a reputation beyond repute$

$Default$

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr fantastic $View Post$

Life's too short. I think I'll wait for it to come out on DVD ......

you are too funny!

__________________

$<img src=http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=3918&dateline=1208895702 border=0 alt= />$

Join the dark side. We have cookies.

$Reply With Quote$

$Reply$

Page 1 of 2

1

« Sketch a reasonable graph of this equation | Trigonometric differentiation problem »

Thread Tools
$Show Printable Version$ Show Printable Version $Email this Page$ Email this Page
Display Modes
$Linear Mode$ Linear Mode $Hybrid Mode$ Switch to Hybrid Mode $Threaded Mode$ Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:56 AM.

your link here Sponsors

rv solar, e-learning, Books | Advertising | Loans | Facebook Proxy | 0 Credit Cards

Math Help Forum is a community of maths forums with an emphasis on maths help in all levels of mathematics.
Register to post your math questions or just hang out and try some of our math games or visit the arcade.